How to Help the Poor to Save a Bit: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya
How to Help the Poor to Save a Bit: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya
7 July, 2020 •Similar Articles
Using lotteries to encourage saving: Experimental evidence from Kenya
In this study, we evaluate the provision of lottery-linked deposit accounts (LLDA) – a savings scheme incorpor...
Debt Relief or Debt Restructuring? Evidence from an Experiment with Distressed Credit Card Borrowers
This paper reports results from a randomized field experiment that offered distressed credit card borrowers more than $50 million in debt forgivene...
Remittances and the Problem of Control: A Field Experiment Among Migrants from El Salvador
While remittance flows to developing countries are very large, it is unknown whether migrants desire more control over how remittances are used. Th...
Partnering with a savings product provider in Kenya, we tested the extent to which behavioral interventions and financial incentives can increase the saving rate of individuals with low and irregular income. Our experiment lasted for six months and included a total of twelve conditions. The control condition received weekly reminders and balance reporting via text messages. The treatment conditions received in addition one of the following interventions: (1) reminder text messages framed as if they came from the participant’s kid (2) a golden coloured coin with numbers for each week of the trial, on which participants were asked to keep track of their weekly deposits (3) a match of weekly savings: The match was either 10% or 20% up to a certain amount per week. The match was either deposited at the end of each week or the highest possible match was deposited at the start of each week and was adjusted at the end. Among these interventions, by far the most effective was the coin: Those in the coin condition saved on average the highest amount and more than twice as those in the control condition. We hypothesize that being a tangible track-keeping object; the coin made subjects remember to save more often. Our results support the line of literature suggesting that saving decisions involve psychological aspects and that policy makers and product designers should take these influences into account.