Prize-Linked Savings Games: Theory and Experiment
Prize-Linked Savings Games: Theory and Experiment
7 July, 2020 •Similar Articles
Financial Education and Savings Behavior: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment among Low-Income Clients of Branchless Banking in India
Financial literacy programs are popular, despite limited evidence that they lead to significant changes in savings behavior. We experimentally test...
Temporal Reframing and Savings: A Field Experiment
A growing percentage of American workers are now freelancers and thus responsible for their own retirement savings, yet they face a number of psych...
Encouraging Consumers to Act at Renewal Evidence from Field Trials in the Home and Motor Insurance Markets
The majority of British home and motor insurance policies automatically renew annually, at a price chosen by the provider, unless consumers activel...
We introduce a game in which each player can allocate her endowment in a prize-linked savings (PLS) account, which awards a fixed prize only to a randomly chosen winner. Like Tullock’s rent-seeking contest, the probability for each player of winning the prize is the ratio of her PLS deposit to the total deposits made by all participating players. We derive a unique equilibrium and further examine the effects of introducing PLS as an alternative savings option to traditional savings (TS), which yields a fixed rate of return. Our theory predicts that, while inducing the group with low TS deposits to save more, PLS will cannibalize TS and reduce total savings in the group with high TS deposits. However, in contrast to the theory, our experimental results show that PLS significantly increases total savings in both groups.