Prize-Linked Savings Games: Theory and Experiment

Prize-Linked Savings Games: Theory and Experiment

7 July, 2020    

We introduce a game in which each player can allocate her endowment in a prize-linked savings (PLS) account, which awards a fixed prize only to a randomly chosen winner. Like Tullock’s rent-seeking contest, the probability for each player of winning the prize is the ratio of her PLS deposit to the total deposits made by all participating players. We derive a unique equilibrium and further examine the effects of introducing PLS as an alternative savings option to traditional savings (TS), which yields a fixed rate of return. Our theory predicts that, while inducing the group with low TS deposits to save more, PLS will cannibalize TS and reduce total savings in the group with high TS deposits. However, in contrast to the theory, our experimental results show that PLS significantly increases total savings in both groups.

Similar Articles
The Persistent Power of Behavioural Change: Long-Run Impacts of Temporary Savings Subsidies for the Poor
I use a field experiment in rural Kenya to study how temporary incentives to save impact long-run economic outcomes. Study participants randomly se...
The Effect of Information on Demand for High-Load Insurance
High-load insurance products, such as extended warranties and rental car insurance, often are criticized for the large profits they generate ...
Moral Incentives in Credit Card Debt Repayment: Evidence from a Field Experiment
We study the role of morality in debt repayment using an experiment with credit card customers of a large Islamic bank in Indonesia. In our main tr...