Saving by Default: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural India
Saving by Default: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural India
7 July, 2020 •Similar Articles
Using Goals to Boost Savings
The Community Empowerment Fund (CEF) is a non-profit organization focused on enabling and sustaining transitions out of homelessness and poverty. F...
Imperfect Recall: The Impact of Composite Spending Information Disclosure on Credit Card Spending
In the past 30 years, consumer credit card debt has expanded tremendously. We know that consumers willingly pay more for the same product when usin...
Bank-Insured RoSCA for Microfinance: Experimental Evidence in Poor Egyptian Villages
Microfinance institutions (MFIs) have continued to grow over the past few decades, both in numbers of clients and portfolio sizes. The growth of th...
Worldwide, people are gaining access to a formal bank account, which allows account-based instead of cash payments. Based on a novel randomized control trial, we document that the payment method is an important determinant of savings behavior. In rural India, we study the effect on savings of allocating identical weekly payments on a bank account (treated) or in cash (control). The treatment impact is huge: savings increase by 110% within three months, and the effect is long-lasting. Villagers paid in cash do not save more in other assets, but increase consumption. Therefore, we infer that being paid on a bank account has a net positive impact on total savings. When we twist the design and start paying everyone in cash, savings and consumption patterns no longer differ between the treated and control. We interpret these findings as the outcome of the default option, and shed light on six plausible underlying mechanisms.