Selective Attention in Consumer Finance: Evidence from a Randomized Intervention in the Credit Card Market
Selective Attention in Consumer Finance: Evidence from a Randomized Intervention in the Credit Card Market
7 July, 2020 •Similar Articles
Incentives for Loan Repayments: Evidence from a Randomized Field Study
This field experiment tests an innovative approach for helping automobile loan borrowers make their loan payments on time. Borrowers were randomly ...
The Effect of Providing Peer Information on Retirement Savings Decisions
Using a field experiment in a 401(k) plan, we measure the effect of disseminating information about peer behavior on savings. Low‐saving employee...
Saving by Default: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural India
Worldwide, people are gaining access to a formal bank account, which allows account-based instead of cash payments. Based on a novel randomized con...
In partnership with a Personal Finance Platform in Brazil, I implement a randomized intervention to measure the effect of reminders for timely payment of credit card bills. While I find a 13% reduction in the cost of late fees paid, 31% of the users that avoid credit card late payments, incur instead overdraft fees on their checking accounts. This leads to heterogeneous gains from the intervention with some users saving 15% in total fees paid, and others incurring increased fees of 5%. I interpret these results using theories of salience-driven selective attention, and argue that informational nudges may inflate the perceived importance of the target task. The results of this experiment suggest that when designing policy interventions, one size may not fit all, and targeting nudges to those who are more likely to benefit from them has the potential to significantly increase the gains from the intervention