Small Cues Change Savings Choices
Small Cues Change Savings Choices
7 July, 2020 •Similar Articles
How Do Consumers Respond When Default Options Push the Envelope?
Many employers have increased the default contribution rates in their retirement plans, generating higher employee savings. However, a large fracti...
Savings Constraints and Microenterprise Development: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Kenya
Does limited access to formal savings services impede business growth in poor countries? To shed light on this question, we randomized access to no...
The Long-Term Effects of Temporary Incentives to Save: Evidence from a Prize-Linked Savings Field Experiment
Are savings accounts experience goods, where consumers learn the value of saving in formal financial institutions only after opening and using an a...
We present evidence from field experiments that savings choices are significantly affected by numerical cues in the environment, even when these cues are at best minimally informative. We randomized the one- or two-sentence savings cues present in emails to employees about their 401(k) savings plan. High savings cues increased 401(k) contribution rates by up to 2.9% of income in a pay period, and low savings cues decreased 401(k) contribution rates by up to 1.4% of income in a pay period. Cues affected 401(k) contribution rates for up to a year after the email.