Why don’t the poor save more? Evidence from health savings experiments
Why don’t the poor save more? Evidence from health savings experiments
7 July, 2020 •Similar Articles
Competition as a savings incentive: A field experiment at a homeless shelter
This paper describes a randomized field experiment testing the impact of a savings competition on the behavior of homeless individuals staying at a...
High Hopes: experimental evidence on saving and the transition to high school in Kenya
We report results of a randomised control trial in which parents of primary-school leavers were encouraged to open a convenient bank account operat...
Subsidies, Savings, and Information Spillovers: A Randomized Experiment in Mozambique
To understand decisions by poor households to save in formal banks, and the impacts thereof, we partnered with a formal bank and randomly assigned ...
Using data from a field experiment in Kenya, we document that providing individuals with simple informal savings technologies can substantially increase investment in preventative health and reduce vulnerability to health shocks. Simply providing a safe place to keep money was sufficient to increase health savings by 66 percent. Adding an earmarking feature was only helpful when funds were put toward emergencies, or for individuals that are frequently taxed by friends and relatives. Group-based savings and credit schemes had very large effects.