Healthcare.gov 3.0 – Behavioral Economics and Insurance Exchanges

Healthcare.gov 3.0 – Behavioral Economics and Insurance Exchanges

7 July, 2020  •  

To test whether such associations might influence people’s perceptions of insurance plans, the researchers interviewed people in buses and asked them which category of plans they would look at first if they were shopping for health insurance. To half the people gold plans were described as having higher monthly premiums and lower out-of-pocket costs For the other half the gold and bronze plans were switched, describing the gold plans as having lower monthly premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs. It shouldn’t matter whether plans are called bronze or gold. Instead, the plans’ attributes —high or low monthly premiums and high or low out-of-pocket costs — should determine people’s choices.

Similar Articles
Mobile-izing savings with automatic contributions: Experimental evidence on dynamic inconsistency and the default effect in Afghanistan
Through a field experiment in Afghanistan, we show that default enrolment in payroll deductions increases rates of savings by 40 percentage points,...
The Effect of Information on Demand for High-Load Insurance
High-load insurance products, such as extended warranties and rental car insurance, often are criticized for the large profits they generate ...
Retirement Contribution Rate Nudges and Plan Participation: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Simple interventions like changing the default or sending a short message can induce individuals to save more for retirement. However, messag...