Healthcare.gov 3.0 – Behavioral Economics and Insurance Exchanges
Healthcare.gov 3.0 – Behavioral Economics and Insurance Exchanges
7 July, 2020 •Similar Articles
Harnessing Emotional Connections to Improve Financial Decisions
This paper exploits the emotional connections and viewer attentiveness of mainstream media to evaluate the economic impact of financial education m...
Spousal control and intra-household decision making: An experimental study in the Philippines
I elicit causal effects of spousal observability and communication on financial choices of married individuals in the Philippines. When choices are...
Between Intention and Action: An Experiment on Individual Savings
This study provides experimental evidence about the barriers to adoption of formal savings in Africa. In collaboration with a large commercial bank...
To test whether such associations might influence people’s perceptions of insurance plans, the researchers interviewed people in buses and asked them which category of plans they would look at first if they were shopping for health insurance. To half the people gold plans were described as having higher monthly premiums and lower out-of-pocket costs For the other half the gold and bronze plans were switched, describing the gold plans as having lower monthly premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs. It shouldn’t matter whether plans are called bronze or gold. Instead, the plans’ attributes —high or low monthly premiums and high or low out-of-pocket costs — should determine people’s choices.