Healthcare.gov 3.0 – Behavioral Economics and Insurance Exchanges
Healthcare.gov 3.0 – Behavioral Economics and Insurance Exchanges
7 July, 2020 •Similar Articles
Nudging Retirement Savings: A Field Experiment on Supplemental Plan
Although supplemental saving plans can be an important part of an individual’s financial security in retirement, contribution rates remain lo...
Smallholder access to weather securities in India
Weather-based insurance products insure farmers against production risks on the basis of a weather index that is highly correlated to local yields....
Insurance Contracts when Individuals “Greatly Value” Certainty: Results from a Field Experiment in Burkina Faso
In discussing the paradoxical violation of expected utility theory that now bears his name, Maurice Allais noted that individuals tend to “greatl...
To test whether such associations might influence people’s perceptions of insurance plans, the researchers interviewed people in buses and asked them which category of plans they would look at first if they were shopping for health insurance. To half the people gold plans were described as having higher monthly premiums and lower out-of-pocket costs For the other half the gold and bronze plans were switched, describing the gold plans as having lower monthly premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs. It shouldn’t matter whether plans are called bronze or gold. Instead, the plans’ attributes —high or low monthly premiums and high or low out-of-pocket costs — should determine people’s choices.