Why bank account access does not translate into usage

Why bank account access does not translate into usage

18 April, 2016    

Underlying the global financial inclusion agenda is the assumption that providing access to and ownership of bank accounts will improve the lives of previously excluded adults and contribute to economic growth objectives. This assumption is reinforced by surveys such as Findex and FinScope, which monitor the progress of financial inclusion policies by tracking the number of ‘banked’ individuals. The headline indicators position bank account ownership as the priority area of inclusion, with other forms of financial inclusion secondary.

Lost in the mail: Why bank account access is not translating into usage (Note 4) scrutinises how bank accounts are being used, analyses why they are being used this way and asks why banks accounts are not used more.

Download the note Size 5mb


Similar Articles
Supporting the development of a digital finance index
Digital financial services are transforming global financial service provision and access. Rapid developments in fintech are disrupting and transfo...
Impact of remittances for recovery and resilience through digital and financial inclusion
In 2021, migrants’ remittance flows to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) reached US$540 billion, onl...
Risks, harms and opportunities in data-driven technology for financial inclusion
How can data and data-driven technologies impact financial inclusion efforts in Africa? ...
Regulatory adaptation: The changing role of financial sector regulators
Considering the changing role of financial regulators and responses to innovation Inno...